# Masonry Columns, Piers and Pilasters

How to analyze and design reinforced masonry columns, piers and pilasters and clarifying effective spacing.

For analysis of masonry members utilizing flanges and compression reinforcement see Masonry – Compression Reinforcement and Effective Flanges

### References

Ref 1: MSJC – 2005, TMS 402 (AKA ACI 530) – 05 (2008 version is very similar). Found here

Ref 2: Masonry Structures Behavior and Design 2nd Edition by Robert Drysdale, Hamid, and Baker. (the Third edition found here)

Ref 3: Reinforced Masonry Engineering Handbook Clay and Concrete Masonry 6th Edition, Max L Porter (James E. Amrhein original author). Found here

## Definitions

Based on MSJC 05 (all should be similar for 08)

#### Column

(MSJC-05 Section 1.6) – An isolated vertical member whose horizontal dimension measured at right angles to its thickness does not exceed 3 times its thickness and whose height is greater than 4 times its thickness.

#### Pier

(MSJC-05 Section 1.6) – An isolated vertical member whose horizontal dimension measured at right angles to its thickness is not less than 3 times its thickness nor greater than 6 times its thickness and whose height is less than 5 times its length. In reference to MSJC these are typically part of wall frames (see Ref 3 page 250) and is why there dimensions are defined as such. This however may be confusing as many times a pier is referred to a column which is built integrally with a wall (see pg 403 of Ref 2). Having said that I believe if the column is built integrally with the wall it would be considered a “flush pilaster” (see Ref 3).

#### Pilaster

– While Ref 1 does not give an explicit definition of a pilaster, it does infer that a pilaster is built integrally with the wall. Ref 2 states that a pilaster is a column that is built integrally with a wall and interacts with the wall to resist an out-of-plane lateral load, it is called a pilaster. Pilasters maybe ‘flush’ (in the plane of the wall) or project out from the wall in one or both directions.

#### Pedestal

– Upright compression member with a ratio of unsupported height to average least lateral dimension not exceeding 3. This term is typically found in concrete design and

refers to short foundation elements. Many may refer to pedestals as piers or foundation piers.

#### Foundation Piers

– (Ref 1) An isolated vertical foundation member whose horizontal dimension measured at right angles to its thickness does not exceed 3 times its thickness and whose height is equal to or less than 4 times its thickness.

#### Wall

– (Ref 1) A vertical element with a horizontal length to thickness ratio greater than 3, used to enclose space.

#### Loadbearing Wall

– (Ref 1) a Wall carrying vertical loads greater than 200 plf in addition to its own weight.

#### Discussion

As you can see these elements may be referred to one another as they all are used to resist axial and flexure. I would need to check the 2011 version of the MSJC but it should also be noted that Piers are found in the Strength Design of Masonry only and Pilaster are only found in the ASD method. However lets look at how the analysis and design differs for each. I think some main points to consider are – Is the element isolated or part of wall construction? If the element is isolated it would generally be considered a column or pier. If it is part of a wall system then it would generally be considered a pilaster or flush pilaster. The main difference then between these is that for column/pier elements there is – added vulnerability due to isolation, typically compression reinforcement and potential for bi-axial bending. Another key to remember is that if the reinforcement is going to be considered to be effective in compression, the enforcement must be tied (confined) for any of the above mentioned elements.

Now lets look at how each classification effects the design.

## Design

### Dimensional Constraints / Effective Widths

This can be hard to keep track of as well. How much of the wall should be taken as effective to resist axial and flexural loads? What are the limits on effective flange widths? It is interesting to note that Ref 3 pg 177 limits the effective flange for pilasters to 3x the wall thickness each side of the pilaster however allows for 6x wall thickness for effective flange width on flanged masonry shear walls.

Effective Width

- Walls – (ref 1 Sect. 2.3.3.3)
- Out-of-plane Forces – Running Bond Effective width shall be the lesser of:
- Center – Center spacing of bars
- 6 x wall thickness
- 72 inches
- H/6 in the case of a flanged shear wall. Where H is the total wall height (between lateral supports transferring load to the load to the shear wall).

- Axial Concentrated Load – Effective width
- 4 x wall thickness + bearing width or length of wall

- Design for Axial and Flexure
- The reinforcement is rarely tied and typically only resists tension forces.
- For ASD if the load is concentrated then the 4x the wall thickness limit would apply otherwise the limits presented in point 1 would apply and the reinforcement would need to be tied if it going to be relied upon to carry compression forces.

- In-Plane Forces – Flanged Shear Walls
- ASD – The flange is limited to 6x wall thickness each side of the web (Ref 3 pg 199)
- Wall intersections shall meet Ref 1 – Section 1.9.4.1

- Out-of-plane Forces – Running Bond Effective width shall be the lesser of:
- Flush Pilasters
- Effective Wdith
- Tpcially taken as 4 x wall thickness (Ref 3 page 178)

- Effective Wdith
- Pilasters
- Effective width
- Ref 1 and 2 – 6 x Wall thickness each side of web
- Ref 3 – 3 x Wall thickness each side of web

- Consideration for flanges to be effective (see Ref 1 – 1.9.4.2).
- Flanges (wall intersections) must be capable to transfer the required shear stress
- Atleast 50% of the masonry units at the interface shall interlock; or Steel connectors grouted into the wall (1/4″x1.5″ x28″ inculding 2″ long 90 deg bend at each end to form a U or Z shape; or Intersecting bond beams shall be provided in intersecting walls at a maximum spacing of 48″ oc (As = 0.1 in^2 and shall be developed on each side of intersection)

- Effective width
- Piers
- Limits on Width
- The width should be greater than 3 x thickness but less than 6 times its thickness
- I believe if it were less than 3 x thickness it would then be a column and if it were greater than 6 it would then be a wall.

- The width should be greater than 3 x thickness but less than 6 times its thickness
- Design limitations – Strength Design
- Max factored axial load (per Ref 1 3.3.4.3.1)
- Max effective height should not exceed 25 x nominal thickness unless the pier is designed according to provisions of Ref 1 Section 3.3.5 (walls, must consider P-Delta effects)
- Nominal thickness should not exceed 16″
- Provide (1) bar in the end cells and minimum area of longitudinal reinforcement should be 0.0007bd
- Uniformly distribute reinforcement

- Limits on Width
- Column
- Limit on Width (Ref 1 – 2.1.6)
- Horizontal dimension measured at right angles to its thickness does not exceed 3 times its thickness. Minimum side dimension should be 8″

- Limits on Height
- Height is greater than 4 times its thickness
- Ratio of Effective Height / least nominal dimension < 25 (Ref 1 – 2.1.6.2)

- ASD Requirements (Ref 1 Section 2.1.6
- Min Side Dimension – 8″
- Height / least nominal dimension <= 25
- Min Moment should be 0.1 x each side dimension
- Min longitudinal reinforcement and shall at least 4 bars
- Max long reinf
- Compression reinforcement shall met lateral tie requirements (as always)

- SD (strength design) Requirements (Ref 1 Section 3.3.4.4)
- Same as ASD except that the provisions limit the distance between lateral support should be limited to 30 x the nominal width where as ASD uses ‘effective height’ (meaning considering end restraints) should be < 24 x thickness. Also max reinforcement shall be per Ref 1 Section 3.3.5 but not to exceed

- Limit on Width (Ref 1 – 2.1.6)
- Lateral Ties
- Requirements (Ref 1 Section 2.1.6.5) If reinforcement is to be considered effective in resisting compressive forces lateral ties must be provided.
- 1/4″ diameter (min)
- Vertical spacing < smaller of –
- 16″
- 48 lateral tie bar diameters
- least cross-sectional dimension

- Every corner and alternate longitudinal bar shall have lateral support provided by the corner of a lateral tie (angle should be less than 135 deg). Except for a circle arrangement which is permitted. No bar bar shall be farther than 6″ (each side) from a laterally supported bar. (i.e. the middle bar should be less than 6″ from 2 bars that are laterally supported by a lateral tie ‘corner’)
- Place lateral ties in mortar joint or grout
- Lap length shall be 48 tie diameters (min)
- Locate the first and last lateral tie at 1/2 spacing. Also above and below single beams framing into the vertical member.
- Where beams or brackets frame into a column from four directions ties may be terminated 3″ (max) from the lowest reinforcement in the shallowest of the beam members framing into the column.

- Requirements (Ref 1 Section 2.1.6.5) If reinforcement is to be considered effective in resisting compressive forces lateral ties must be provided.